The way it works is the software reads interlaced lines on the chip during the exposure: every other one for guiding, and the rest for imaging. Half way through the process, the image is downloaded to memory and the other half of the chip's pixel rows is used for imaging. The results are added together to form a final image.
The STAR system itself is a cable that runs to an opticoupler box (acts as relays to your scope's mount electronics), a cable from the box to the mount's drive, and control software for imaging and guiding. Any scope with an LX-200 or ST-4 capable drive system should work. You should contact Starlight Xpress if you are unsure.
I must have taken thirty or more images before I realized that I thought I had read someplace that the base of the camera (tripod mount plate) should be aligned with the East-West axis of the mount. In fact, that information was in the manual! That will teach me! Sure enough, my MX5c was aligned north-south. SO, I twisted it 90 degrees in the holder and started over (2 hours later). That did the trick, and I was able to train the guide software and guide flawlessly for exposures up to 30 minutes. It could have easily gone longer, but it was 1:00am local time, and I was getting tired.
The process I came up with for FASTAR mode C8's and the MX5c STAR2000 is as follows:
*Applies only to MX5c color imagers.
An oddity with the software: It gets the guide exposure data from the "Exposure Range" section of the dialog. If that is set to minutes, then you can not check the "self guide next exposure" box. Selecting 1 second in the "Exposure Range" box will again re-allow you to check the self guide box.
In the remaining time that I had before falling asleep, I tried a prime exposure shot. The rules are the same. Keep the base plate of the MX5c aligned east-west! Reset the drive correction rate on the G-11 to 0.5x, and all should be well. I was operating at f/6.3 on the C-8 for this.
Also noted, if when you are in the guiding process and the star seems to fly out of the field with increasing rapidity, you may have to check the appropriate reverse direction checkbox in the program defaults screen (swap e-w, swa n-s). This is easily seen though and is unlike the lost tracking first seen when the camera is aligned incorrectly in the focusser.
Exposure times for good color have to be long. Be aware that good saturations come with exposures in the 20 to 30 minute range or more. This is due to the fact that one is really losing 50% of the time of each integration to guiding the image.
I also found that the image processing ability of the STAR2000 software to be minimal. I followed the route of saving the image, then converting it to color and saving it as a TIF. I then took the TIF into MaxImDL and performed a color rebalance followed by a Digital Development Process to extract the best colors and contrast levels.
I have posted a couple of the images online for people to see:
The first is a 20 minute integration. The second is a 30 minute integration. The third is a mosaic of the two. You will note a lighter greenish glow in the upper left corner of the images. This is from the CCD's amp circuit and can be removed by using dark frames. I was just too tired (call me lazy ;-)
| Contents | What's Up | Feature | Papers | Photos |
| Links | Observations | Spectra | Sketches |
Last Modified: 3/19/03 8:55p
This page:© Copyright 2005 by John A. Blackwell